Fixing Barriers: Targeted, Prioritized, Step-by-Step

You have found 100 barriers, but where do you start? Do not get overwhelmed. easyMonitoring automatically prioritizes errors by relevance so you can immediately minimize critical compliance risks under the EAA / BFSG. But beware: automated scans never find everything. We show you how to efficiently combine automated preparation with targeted manual adjustments to make your website, online services, and digital offerings accessible step-by-step: for blind users, people with impairments, and all other users.

Fixing barriers – prioritized implementation of web accessibility according to WCAG and EAA / BFSG requirements

Risk-Based Prioritization: What Comes First?

Not every barrier is equally critical. The WCAG guidelines – the technical standards for accessible web content – distinguish three levels of conformance. easyMonitoring automatically classifies all failed checks according to these standards. This allows you to focus your efforts on what matters most to blind users, people with limitations, and all other users – and what the law strictly requires.

  • check Critical (WCAG Level A): Barriers that completely exclude certain user groups – such as blind individuals who rely on alternative texts. Fix immediately.
  • check High (WCAG Level AA): The legal minimum standard under the EAA / BFSG – covers aspects like contrast, navigation, and operability. Implement promptly.
  • check Medium / Low (WCAG Level AAA): Best practices and recommendations for maximum accessibility – tackle step-by-step where possible.
Risk-based prioritization of accessibility checks according to WCAG Level A, AA, and AAA

Estimating Effort Realistically: Quick Wins vs. Structural Measures

Not all barriers require the same amount of effort to fix. This overview shows which measures can make content accessible within hours – and which require deeper technical adjustments. A realistic assessment helps you allocate resources effectively and achieve visible progress quickly.

Effort

Measures

Responsible

🟢 Quick Wins

Hours to 1 day

  • Add alternative texts for images or generate them automatically
  • Set the language attribute (lang="en") in HTML – otherwise, screen readers will mispronounce content
  • Use descriptive link texts instead of "click here"
  • Optimize page titles and meta descriptions
  • Correct the heading hierarchy in existing copy and content

Editorial, Content Team

🟡 Medium Effort

Several days

  • Systematically adjust color contrasts between text and background in the design system
  • Properly link form labels and error messages with input fields
  • Provide subtitles, transcripts, and alternative formats for video and audio content
  • Implement skip links and visible focus indicators for keyboard users
  • Switch font sizes to relative units – improving readability for all users

Design, Frontend Development

🔴 Structural Measures

Weeks to months

  • Ensure complete operability via keyboard – without a mouse – for all interactive features
  • Fundamentally restructure semantic HTML and ARIA attributes – the foundation for all assistive tools
  • Establish screen reader compatibility for complex web UI components
  • Redesign layout structures to ensure a correct reading order
  • Embed accessibility as a default standard in development and content workflows

Development, Architecture

Note: This assessment serves as a general guide. Actual effort depends on your technical infrastructure, CMS, and current compliance status.

Typical Implementation Errors and How to Avoid Them

Many companies approach accessibility with genuine commitment but stumble into the exact same pitfalls. Knowing these saves time, preserves resources, and mitigates legal risks under the EAA / BFSG.

Error 1: Treating a widget as a complete solution

An assistive widget like easyVision grants users more control over layout, font sizes, and contrast, but it does not replace structural accessibility. Screen readers require valid HTML, and keyboard users need a correct focus order. A widget is a valuable addition, not a substitute for core technical implementation.

Error 2: Relying solely on automated testing and assuming total safety

Automated tests cover roughly 30–40% of WCAG criteria. Relying exclusively on tool results leaves blind spots for barriers that can only be identified manually, such as vague error messages or logical reading order issues. easyMonitoring provides the automated foundation but does not replace supplementary manual audits.

Error 3: Ignoring language and readability

Accessibility goes beyond technical entry points. The WCAG principle of understandability requires that language, navigation, and content be clear for all users, including those with cognitive limitations. Plain language and clear error responses are just as important as proper image alternative texts.

Error 4: Forgetting the accessibility statement

Fixing layout barriers alone does not fulfill all legal mandates. The EAA / BFSG requires the publication of an accessibility statement detailing current status, outstanding barriers, and available alternatives. In cases of partial compliance, it serves as the primary proof of active optimization efforts to regulators.

Accessibility as a Continuous Process, Not a One-Time Project

Digital accessibility is not a static milestone to reach and check off. New content, design tweaks, and technical refactoring can introduce fresh barriers into websites, digital offerings, and online services at any time. The EAA / BFSG and EU accessibility standards expect companies to maintain a continuous improvement cycle – regular audits are the only way to demonstrate this process and keep content accessible for the long run.

  • check Continuous Testing: easyMonitoring automatically scans your website – catching new barriers before they violate regulatory requirements
  • check Documenting Progress: The accessibility score tracks your development over time – measurable, traceable, and ready to show regulatory bodies
  • check Legal Proof: Documented test histories and an updated accessibility statement prove active compliance efforts for both public institutions and private enterprises
  • check Step-by-Step Approach: No company is expected to meet 100% of the principles overnight – active progression and documented metrics are what the law requires
  • check Staying Current: WCAG and regional regulations adapt over time – easyMonitoring keeps you aligned with the latest standards and compliance updates
Accessibility as a continuous process – compliance monitoring through regular audits

An Overview of SiteCockpit Tools for Your Implementation

SiteCockpit does not handle direct code implementation – but it offers automated solutions and actionable guidance for the most common barriers. These tools support your team in designing accessible digital content and keeping a verified record of your progress.

easyMonitoring – Audit & Prioritize

Comprehensive auditing according to WCAG criteria and European guidelines, featuring automatic sorting of failed checks by severity. Helps businesses systematically pinpoint barriers and remain fully compliant.

Discover easyMonitoring

easyAlt – Alternative Texts for Images

AI-driven alternative text generation for all images across your website – automated and WCAG-compliant. Makes visual assets clear for blind individuals and screen reader software without manual content drafting.

Discover easyAlt

Contrast Checker – Verify Readability

Evaluate layout color combinations directly against WCAG compliance rules – covering standard text, large display features, and UI elements. Get instant feedback without shifting to separate tools wherever possible.

Use Contrast Checker

Frequently Asked Questions About Accessibility Implementation